ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 20 社会情報学部
  2. 0001 群馬大学社会情報学部研究論集
  3. 第10巻 (2003)

二様の自己 : コールリッジにおける自伝精神

http://hdl.handle.net/10087/2336
http://hdl.handle.net/10087/2336
947adda7-40c7-4845-82be-69992f96ef39
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
KJ00000696943.pdf KJ00000696943.pdf (1.2 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2007-12-25
タイトル
タイトル 二様の自己 : コールリッジにおける自伝精神
言語
言語 jpn
その他のタイトル
その他のタイトル Two Kinds of the Self: The Autobiographical Spirit in Coleridge
著者 小林, 徹

× 小林, 徹

WEKO 1109

小林, 徹

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 As the cases of Wordsworth and De Quincey clearly show, writing about the self is a kind of literary obsession for the Romantics. Both of them had repeatedly revised their autobiographical writings, the Prelude and the Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, over many years. This seems to be true to Coleridge, because he too not only wrote Biographia Literaria, but also sent to his friends letters which depict his life as it were. However, viewed from the point of the generic tradition of autobiography, his literal activities on the self are more complicated and have significance toward the problems of himself and the literary genre which was to be developed in the modern era. First of all, the Biographia is not a modern autobiography since the author, like many autobiographers before the Romantics had been, is rather defensive there to manage to build up his intellectual figure against the bad reputations from the literary circle. It had been Coleridge's intention to be as such during his lifetime and this is evident in his unsuccessful attempt to publish Logosophia which was to be the decisive proof of his long intellectual activities. But he was not deprived of the modern way of writing of the self which was realized in .the autobiographies of Wordsworth and De Quincey. While staying in Malta, Coleridge wrote a short, but rich, autobiographical note where he investigated his own inner self from the aspect of temporality and recognized that his past and present selves could be united through the agency of his deep feeling, "dread." These different ways of writing mean that Coleridge vacillated between the self as an intellectual being and the self always in "dread" and could not unify them at least in verbal representation. This predicament is yet another scene of his everlasting ambivalent feeling toward theunity in general which is in other ways recognized in his poetry, poetics, conversation and so on. Then, more importantly it proves the writing of an autobiography to be more difficult in the modern age.
書誌情報 群馬大学社会情報学部研究論集

巻 10, p. 75-90, 発行日 2003-03-31
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 1346-8812
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN10477040
フォーマット
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 application/pdf
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
出版者
出版者 群馬大学社会情報学部
資源タイプ
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Departmental Bulletin Paper
更新日
日付 2017-03-27
日付タイプ Created
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-06-19 14:00:16.374799
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3