WEKO3
アイテム
二様の自己 : コールリッジにおける自伝精神
http://hdl.handle.net/10087/2336
http://hdl.handle.net/10087/2336947adda7-40c7-4845-82be-69992f96ef39
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2007-12-25 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 二様の自己 : コールリッジにおける自伝精神 | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| その他のタイトル | ||||||
| その他のタイトル | Two Kinds of the Self: The Autobiographical Spirit in Coleridge | |||||
| 著者 |
小林, 徹
× 小林, 徹 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | As the cases of Wordsworth and De Quincey clearly show, writing about the self is a kind of literary obsession for the Romantics. Both of them had repeatedly revised their autobiographical writings, the Prelude and the Confessions of an English Opium-Eater, over many years. This seems to be true to Coleridge, because he too not only wrote Biographia Literaria, but also sent to his friends letters which depict his life as it were. However, viewed from the point of the generic tradition of autobiography, his literal activities on the self are more complicated and have significance toward the problems of himself and the literary genre which was to be developed in the modern era. First of all, the Biographia is not a modern autobiography since the author, like many autobiographers before the Romantics had been, is rather defensive there to manage to build up his intellectual figure against the bad reputations from the literary circle. It had been Coleridge's intention to be as such during his lifetime and this is evident in his unsuccessful attempt to publish Logosophia which was to be the decisive proof of his long intellectual activities. But he was not deprived of the modern way of writing of the self which was realized in .the autobiographies of Wordsworth and De Quincey. While staying in Malta, Coleridge wrote a short, but rich, autobiographical note where he investigated his own inner self from the aspect of temporality and recognized that his past and present selves could be united through the agency of his deep feeling, "dread." These different ways of writing mean that Coleridge vacillated between the self as an intellectual being and the self always in "dread" and could not unify them at least in verbal representation. This predicament is yet another scene of his everlasting ambivalent feeling toward theunity in general which is in other ways recognized in his poetry, poetics, conversation and so on. Then, more importantly it proves the writing of an autobiography to be more difficult in the modern age. | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
群馬大学社会情報学部研究論集 巻 10, p. 75-90, 発行日 2003-03-31 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 1346-8812 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN10477040 | |||||
| フォーマット | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 群馬大学社会情報学部 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Departmental Bulletin Paper | |||||
| 更新日 | ||||||
| 日付 | 2017-03-27 | |||||
| 日付タイプ | Created | |||||